• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Jennifer Marohasy

Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Speaker
  • Blog
  • Temperatures
  • Coral Reefs
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Housing & Building

Counting Energy Efficiencies: Wooden Verus Cement Floors

June 8, 2006 By jennifer

At the recent Timber Communities Australia national conference, prominent federal Labor politician Martin Ferguson called for a rethink of the national energy efficiency standards for residential buildings in Australia. He told conference delegates:

“Whilst we would all support practical measures that increase energy efficiency, it seems to me that the new building standards are underpinned by too many questionable assumptions and too little scientific evidence.

So does the Productivity Commission which reported its concerns about the analytical basis for the standards last October.

The key issue is the focus on reducing household energy running costs and the thermal performance of the building shell.

And, at least at the time the Productivity Commission was undertaking its investigations the Australian Greenhouse Office’s (AGO) home design manual noted that true low energy building design will consider embodied energy and take a broader life-cycle approach to energy assessment – merely looking at the energy used to operate the building is not really acceptable.

Because timber framed construction is lightweight in nature, it does not fit the thermal performance philosophy.
The analytical basis used also means that concrete slab-on-ground comes up trumps for efficiency over suspended timber flooring.

Consequently, $70 million worth of sales a year have been lost in the Victorian timber flooring market since the Victorian rating system was introduced.

This is despite the fact that a 1999 study undertaken for the AGO found it would take 62 years to get a net greenhouse benefit from a concrete floor over a timber floor.

And recent research indicates a concrete slab produces a net increase in CO2 emissions of 15 tonnes per house compared to a timber floor.

The problem is the standards ignore the fact that cement is highly energy intensive to produce while timber is a renewable resource, grown using direct sunlight and processed using relatively little energy in sawmills.
And sometimes, the energy in sawmills is produced using biomass from wood waste itself.

The Productivity Commission has recommended the Australian Building Codes Board commission an independent evaluation of energy efficiency standards to determine how effective they have been in reducing actual – not simulated – energy consumption and whether the financial benefits to individual producers and consumers have outweighed the associated costs.

And the sooner the government ensures this is done, the better because in the meantime the timber industry is suffering and it may well be doing so for no good reason.

I am pleased to see that the industry has successfully lobbied the Victorian government for an amnesty on wooden floors in new homes until April 2007 to allow time to address this issue.

But it is clear that the greens are now much more sophisticated in their attack on the forest industries, directly targeting industry markets to achieve their ends.

The Wilderness Society responded to the Victorian amnesty saying it was a “cynical attempt by the industry to maintain market share” rather than improve energy ratings or environmental sustainability.”

My house is cold in winter, it is wooden, with old wooden floors. But its my choice and I can’t understand why environmental groups don’t support the Australian timber industry so other home owners can appreciate the beauty of wood… wooden floors, wooden furniture, wooden window frames. And as Martin Ferguson said at the conference:

“Australia has 164 million hectares of native forests – 4% of the world’s forests – and 1.7 million hectares of plantations.

About 10% of our native forests are managed for wood production with less than 1% being harvested in any one year. That small proportion of forests harvested annually is regenerated so that a perpetual supply of native hardwood and softwood is maintained in this country.

Australia’s rigorous forestry standard, the AFS, has global mutual recognition under the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification, the largest international sustainability recognition framework for forestry in the world.

But the greens are running a duplicitous campaign around the globe to undermine the status of the standard.”

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Energy & Nuclear, Forestry, Housing & Building

Which Climate Change Consensus? (Part 3)

January 27, 2006 By jennifer

There are some interesting questions being posed at the Which Climate Change Consensus? (Part 2) thread. Following are two questions from Graham Young that interests me. They seems to have been lost amongst the more general policy and economic discussion about Kyoto.

David,

Your quotation from the MIT piece illustrates the problem that you have with your models. You say “a projected 18 percent increase [in CO2] resulting from fossil fuel combustion to the year 2000 (320 ppm to 379 ppm) might increase the surface temperature of the earth 0.5C”. Now CO2 is at 380 ppm and you are claiming a rise in surface temperature of 0.5 degrees.

So far, so good, but as we know that temperature of the earth can and does vary independently of CO2 concentrations, how do you know that the rise was due to CO2 alone? And if it wasn’t, then in fact you may have overshot or undershot by more than the 0.5 degrees. If you overshot, your modelling was completely unsuccessful, and if you undershot, then things are a lot worse than you thought.

The IPCC graph at http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/figspm-4.htm is interesting.

It shows general trends between model and observations reaching more or less the same end point, but with significant divergences along the way. You’d probably get a better feel for this by graphing a rolling average.

But you might well be getting this result by massaging the factors that are programmed in until you get a reasonably good fit, but without those factors necessarily being the right ones if you are missing some ingredients.

I’ve gleaned some of my information from the graphs that Jennifer put up on the site on the 28th November. While you’re explaining your models, could you please tell me what the mechanism is that makes temperature dive just after the peaks in CO2 shown in those graphs?

Graham Young

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Housing & Building

Wooden Floors Fail Enery-Efficiency Test

December 4, 2005 By jennifer

I live in Brisbane in an old Queenslander. These are wooden houses traditionally with high ceilings and on stilts to allow for air circulation and beat the heat of the tropics. They tend to be difficult to insulate and my home is particularly cold during our brief winter. When there is no breeze the house can also be hot in summer.

There was some discussion about energy efficient homes at this web-log on 25th November; that was the day the Australian Building Codes Board meet to discuss implementing a 5-star building standard for new homes across the whole of Australia, click here.

In a comment following the post Steve explained:

This standard relates to a home’s thermal design – how much energy is required to keep it cool in summer and warm in winter.

Victoria had already implemented a 5-star requirement for new homes, since July 2004.

In addition to the 5-star requirement, the Victorian policy requires the home builder to also install either a solar hot water system OR a raintank.

The Housing industry media release posted by Jen is about the implmenetation of 5-star across the country.

According to the today’s The Sunday Mail – a local Brisbane paper – the resulting new energy-efficiency laws could spell the end of the iconic Queenslander home:

Changes to the building code to be adopted next year mean wooden houses and timber floors could be a thing of the past, Federal Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane told The Sunday Mail yesterday.

The “five-star” energy-efficiency measures to be introduced from May are also tipped to increase the cost of building an average house by up to $15,000.

Mr Macfarlane called the decision a “terrible mistake” and warned it would be the death of elevated homes built with timber floors on stilts.

“The ordinary house on stumps

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Housing & Building

Designed to Be Energy Efficient – or Not?

November 25, 2005 By jennifer

Through an agreement with the building sector, the Australian Government has resolved to eliminate worst energy performance practices through a national standard approach to minimum performance requirements for buildings, see Greenhouse Office website.

Based on this advice, the Australian Building Codes Board is set to consider the introduction of five-star energy regulations in all new homes when it meets today.

But the Housing Industry Association say it is all a crock. According to their media release:

The regulations will not deliver a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, nor making significant inroads into energy savings. By 2020 they will have imposed a $31.5 billion cost on Australian families for a saving of just 0.8 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Housing & Building

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Ian Thomson on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Dave Ross on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Dave Ross on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Alex on Incarceration Nation: Frightened of Ivermectin, and Dihydrogen monoxide
  • Wilhelm Grimm III on Incarceration Nation: Frightened of Ivermectin, and Dihydrogen monoxide

Subscribe For News Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Jan    

Archives

Footer

About Me

Jennifer Marohasy Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD has worked in industry and government. She is currently researching a novel technique for long-range weather forecasting funded by the B. Macfie Family Foundation. Read more

Subscribe For News Updates

Subscribe Me

Contact Me

To get in touch with Jennifer call 0418873222 or international call +61418873222.

Email: jennifermarohasy at gmail.com

Connect With Me

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2014 - 2018 Jennifer Marohasy. All rights reserved. | Legal

Website by 46digital