Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

Uncategorized

Marie Claire Says No to GM

By

Marie Claire is a popular magazine read by many educated and socially conscious young women in Australia. My daughter Caroline has just drawn my attention to page 170 of the November 2005 issue where readers are told to ‘Say No to Genetically Modified Food’. There is a link to the Greenpeace true food site.

Interestingly the paragraph in the magazine begins “Genetically engineered (GE) foods might mean your vegetables last a bit longer, but there is growing concern about the long-term environmental and health effects of this technology.”

But hang on, there are no GM/GE vegetables for sale in Australia!

Perhaps the most available GM derived product in Australia is vegetable oil from GM cotton seed. Australian cotton farmers that grew GM varieties last season, used on average 88 percent less pesticide than farmers who grew conventional varities.

Exactly how and why is GM bad for the environment? I can only see benefits in the technology?

Those who oppose GM technology, including on the basis that corporate farms are bad, may like this site … http://www.themeatrix.com/ .

The video is compelling and check out the expression on the pig’s face when he decides to join the crusade.

Camel’s Poo Too

By

Just back from another day at the beach: this time Mooloolaba which is an hour and a bit north of Brisbane. The sky was a perfect blue and a terrific breeze chopped the tops off some of the waves.

There are no camels at Mooloolaba. But I see today a story at ABC Online about camels at Broome’s cable beach and how they will soon be fitted with ‘poo bags’.

I guess the bags can be emptied where the poo can be mulched – rather than washed out to sea? I don’t know about the ocean off the north west, but parts of Australia’s east coast are nutrient poor. I wonder what the decision to mandate ‘poo bags’ was based on?

I will be in Darwin later this week at a conference on ‘population’. In preparation I have been reading a paper by Ron Brunton titled ‘The End of the Overpopulation Crisis’. He quotes from Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 book ‘The population bomb’:

I have understood the population explosion intellectually for a long time. I came to understand it emotionally one stinking hot night in Delhi a few years ago … The streets seemed alive with people. People eating, people washing, people sleeping. People visiting, arguing and screaming. People thrusting their hands through the taxi window, begging. People defecating and urinating. People clinging to buses. People herding animals. People, people, people, people. AS we moved slowly through the mob, hand horn squawking, the dust, noise, heat and cooking fires gave the scence a hellish aspect.

Brunton remarked “Clearly, Ehrlich felt some revulsion at the culturally unfamiliar use of personal and public space by a people who were physically different from himself.”

I reckon Ehrlich would also be intolerant of camel’s pooing on the beach.

Two Quotes for this Week

By

1. Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months. Oscar Wilde

2. Everybody talks about the weather but nobody does anything about it. Charles D. Warner

Quotes from two readers of this web-log. Thanks.
…………………..

And I might post another ‘quote for the week’ next Friday. So feel free to send me your best quote for next week, next week. In the interim perhaps post your best quote from this week as a comment below. Cheers,

Michael Crichton & DDT

By

There has been a focus on Michael Crichton and what he doesn’t know about climate, see this post and thread.

What does he know about environmentalism? I remember his speech in San Francisco a couple of years ago, it began:

“I have been asked to talk about what I consider the most important challenge facing mankind, and I have a fundamental answer. The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda. Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in the information age (or as I think of it, the disinformation age) it takes on a special urgency and importance.

We must daily decide whether the threats we face are real, whether the solutions we are offered will do any good, whether the problems we’re told exist are in fact real problems, or non-problems. Every one of us has a sense of the world, and we all know that this sense is in part given to us by what other people and society tell us; in part generated by our emotional state, which we project outward; and in part by our genuine perceptions of reality. In short, our struggle to determine what is true is the struggle to decide which of our perceptions are genuine, and which are false because they are handed down, or sold to us, or generated by our own hopes and fears.

As an example of this challenge, I want to talk today about environmentalism. And in order not to be misunderstood, I want it perfectly clear that I believe it is incumbent on us to conduct our lives in a way that takes into account all the consequences of our actions, including the consequences to other people, and the consequences to the environment. I believe it is important to act in ways that are sympathetic to the environment, and I believe this will always be a need, carrying into the future. I believe the world has genuine problems and I believe it can and should be improved. But I also think that deciding what constitutes responsible action is immensely difficult, and the consequences of our actions are often difficult to know in advance.

Keeping reading Download file.

I don’t agree with everything Crichton has written/said here. But it is worth a read. It provides an insight. He is an optimist. He cares about the truth, about people, and he has an interest in DDT.

When I lived in SW Madagascar in the late 1980s DDT was a big issue as was cerebral malaria. People had their huts sprayed with DDT in the hope that it would save them from malaria.

I was sent this link, which gives an insight into DDT and its potential to save lives in 2005. The article is titled ‘Fighting malaria with DDT in South Africa’and is from BBC News.

Yes and No to GM

By

Dear all,

The latest biennial Biotechnology Australia consumer survey results have been released this morning. This is the fourth such survey undertaken in Australia.

I have attached a summary of the results which compares them with the results of 2003. There are no obvious developments, with most people seeing all applications as risky. Three interesting and contradictory points to note:
– 51 per cent agreed that “Australian farms and foods need to be free of GMOs to remain internationally competitive”
– 56 per cent agreed “Australian farmers need access to gene technology to stay internationally competitive”
– 55 per cent agreed “We have to accept some degree of risk from gene technology if it enhances Australia’s economic competitiveness”

The full reports for 1999, 2003 and 2005 are available from www.biotechnology.gov.au/reports.

Kind regards,
Larissa Mullot
Public Affairs
Agrifood Awareness Australia Limited

A Big Fix

By

Professor Ian Lowe’s new book titled ‘A Big Fix: Radical solutions for Australia’s Environemntal Crisis’ will be launched in Melbourne tomorrow.

Graham Young heard Lowe on radio national yesterday advertising the book and did an interesting post on the book, John Howard, AGW and ‘Fear’ that includes that phrase the ‘dictatorship of the scientariat’, the post is here.

You may remember I did a few posts on the book . I ended up converting them into an opinion piece which was published in Brisbane’s Courier Mail today.

The Courier Mail led with a piece by the Professor:
http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,16832802%255E27197,00.html .
And then followed with something by me:
http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,16832847%255E27197,00.html.

Thanks for the comments on the original posts, including from Steve, which helped focus the mind – which helped with the writing of the piece.