• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Jennifer Marohasy

Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Speaker
  • Blog
  • Temperatures
  • Coral Reefs
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Archives for April 2019

Smashed by Debbie – Middle Island Corals

April 24, 2019 By jennifer

WE have been led to believe that smashed coral is our fault – that when it is lying on the sea floor as untidy piles of grey it is because of catastrophic human-caused global warming. But just maybe coral bleaching and cyclones are natural, and not even increasing in extent.

I visited four reefs during my recent adventures off Bowen. One of these, the reef fringing Middle Island, has been very badly damaged by cyclone Debbie, which hovered over Bowen in April 2017.

Jen getting ready to take more photographs, off Middle Island, 22 April 2019.

Just two years later much of this reef is unattractive – but certainly not desolate.

After gearing-up I jumped over-board from The Skipper’s boat with my little red Olympus (TG-5) camera on Monday – and my new snorkelling buddy Matt.

Every time I stopped swimming, watched, and waited I saw something special swim past.

This green turtle swam past me, over all the broken grey corals at Middle Island reef, 22 April 2019.

There were also large, colourful parrot fish. But I didn’t manage to capture them on this short video – my first attempt at underwater movie-making.

As I snorkeled sometimes the backdrop was broken coral. Other times I swam over meadows of algae. But I never had to swim far before seeing something special – like a mushroom or staghorn coral. They were often solitary: the very early stages of regeneration at an otherwise often ugly reef.

This mushroom coral (Fungia sp, family Cnidaria) was in a meadow of algae – alone at the Middle Island reef, on 22 April 2019.
A lonely Acropora, evidence of regeneration off Middle Island, 22 April 2019.

Occasionally I would stumble on an area of faster growing soft coral with sponges.

In some places soft corals and sponges are already growing back, off Middle Island on 22 April 2019.

That the cyclone had smashed large Porites coral clear in half gives some idea of how powerful it was.

A Porites coral smashed in half, most likely from the force of the waves pounding from the cyclonic winds two years ago off Middle Island when Cyclone Debbie struck.

But even delicate black feather corals are coming back … one at a time.

Black feather coral, growing alone on a hollowed out Porites – under the water off Middle Island, 22 April 2019.

********

The first/feature photo is of me (Jennifer Marohasy) getting ready to jump in, with a view across to the north eastern edge of Middle Island, off Bowen, on 22 April 2019; photo credit John Barnes.

The first link embedded into this post is from the Bureau’s website suggesting a declining, certainly not increasing, trend in the incidence of cyclone. I’ve just downloaded this page and am archiving it here: TropicalCycloneTrends-20190424

Also, it should be noted, that the Bureau did overhype the category for Cyclone Marcia, as I detailed in an article for On Line Opinion, also archived here: CycloneMaricawasnotcategory5-Queenslanders . The Bureau were much more accurate when it came to reporting of Cyclone Debbie.

Filed Under: Information Tagged With: Great Barrier Reef

The Eerie Ancient Coral Reef at Bowen, with a Crocodile

April 22, 2019 By jennifer

MOST people rarely venture into nature – they certainly don’t spend much time on coral reefs. When they do, they may expect the fish and corals to be as bright, colourful and perfect as the last nature documentary that they saw in full surround-sound on a wide screen.

Such images come from professional photographers staying underwater for hours, perhaps after having waited days for very calm weather, so the water is exceptionally clear. Of course, such photographs are enhanced by bright lighting, so most of the footage would be taken on very sunny days. Also, a great expanse of shallow water – gives depth to the footage, and the further off-shore generally the clearer the water.

Hard coral at Horseshoe Bay growing next to an oyster bed – my first underwater photograph (20 April 2019). I saw the same type of coral, but in shades of green, pink and purple at Bramston Reef at depth on 21 April 2019.

The Great Barrier Reef is vast. If you click onto the webpage at this link you will find zoning maps that give an idea of how long and how wide – in fact the area is visible from outer space.

Scroll down and click on Map 9, and you will find a map showing so many reefs off Bowen.

Bowen has made headlines for some years now – it is the place where Terry Hughes and other leading academics claim the reef is totally dead, and that this is representative of the whole inshore Great Barrier Reef. They are so wrong.

There is so much coral here off Bowen, and there are so many extensive areas of coral reef, and most are a very long way off shore – making the visit to just one of the outer reefs a long day trip by fishing boat.

Because cyclones and coral bleaching are a regular occurrence, the exact state of the corals at particular reef is not always predictable and in constant flux. This has been the case for thousands of years.

The Great Barrier Reef has existed for about 10,000 years: when sea levels rose at the beginning of the current geological epoch known as the Holocene. Because the reefs have been growing up-wards for thousands of years – while sea levels have fallen over one metre in the last 5,000 years – they are very vulnerable to bleaching, particularly when there is calm weather on a very low tide leaving corals high and dry for long periods.

Nevertheless, it is possible to find so much healthy coral, even at Bowen … at Horseshoe Bay, which is just around the corner from Queens Bay that is shown in the far-left corner of Map 9.

I’ve been in Bowen for several days now … waiting for the strong south-southeasterly winds to ease so we can take the boat out to visit some off-shore islands. The Skipper did take me out late yesterday (when we had a few hours of calm) to see the coral the other side of Bramston reef – I’m meaning beyond the mud flat and reef flat that I walked last Friday on the very low tide.

It is so wrong for Terry Hughes to suggest that this reef has all been reduced to mud flat. That the coral off Bowen is all dead.

There is live coral, and lots of it, at depth at Bramston reef. I got lots of photographs from my cheap camera and just snorkelling (no tank) and I might post more in due course.

A great diversity of soft corals just off Bowen, 21 April 2019.

My preference would be to get a professional underwater photographer to take better photographs and as a movie so you can see the full extent of this ancient reef.

Late yesterday some of Bramston reef looked so eerie – then again it is about 4,500 years old.

Someone needs to go down with a good camera and a tank of oxygen and get extensive footage that shows the great diversity, and all the fish – there might even be a crocodile hiding somewhere.

Parts of Bramston reef have been reduced to rubble, some from Cyclone Debbie that hovered over Bowen just two years ago. But there is also new coral, and extensive areas of healthy and live corals at this ancient reef.

No filter, no colour touch-up … Matt snapped this image at Bramston reef some metres down, yesterday.

I’m hoping to see another ancient reef off Bowen this afternoon … perhaps the Skipper and Matt will take me to Middle Island.

In the meantime, subscribe at my blog, so you are sure to be one of the first to find out when, and if, I can find a professional underwater photographer to show you ancient Bramston reef, including the crocodile.

If you are impatient and overseas, just jump on a plane and then bus or train it to Bowen. Nicole Kidman has even been here, but she thought Bowen was Darwin. Don’t believe Hollywood, the academics or doomsayers (the Elites can be so lame) – there is so much more than mudflats and cowboys at Bowen.

Matt snorkeling with me off Bowen, yesterday. The water looks very blue, but visibility was poor once you put your bottom-up and swam down very far. It is not always like this, sometimes the water is so crystal clear, especially here, off Bowen.

*****
The feature image is of me, and very happy, because I had just been snorkeling at Horseshoe Bay (Bowen) – and there are so many pretty corals, and I saw a sting ray.

Photo credit John Barnes.

Filed Under: Information Tagged With: Great Barrier Reef

Denying the Littoral Zone at the Great Barrier Reef

April 20, 2019 By jennifer

The coral reef off Bowen, in North Queensland, is only dead to the 2,500 marine scientists who attended the conference in Cairns on 9th July 2012. That day, they were shown photographs of a mudflat … and told that mud now covers what was once healthy coral reef, and that this reef off Bowen is an example of the “sad decline” of the Great Barrier Reef.

The photographs shown by Terry Hughes on that day were misleading.

There is still a lot of coral off Bowen. At Bramston Reef it is more than one kilometre off shore, beyond the mudflat, and beyond the reef flat – both of which are teeming with life.

This is the littoral zone: the area between the highest and lowest tides once of so much interest to biologists. But like so much of our natural history it is being denied by the doomsayers and activists who now manage the narrative and seem completely averse to a bit of mud. They seem to expect the entire shoreline to be covered in bright corals with Nemo swimming around, but this was never the case.

Yesterday, on the very lowest tide of this month, I walked across an expanse of mudflat and then sandy reef flat before finding myself blocked by Acropora coral, which would normally be underwater. I could see massive Porites just out of the water in the distance. But the tide was turning, and so I headed back.

Corals, normally underwater, exposed at the very lowest tide on 19 April 2019, 1.3 km from the high water mark on the mainland – not far from Stone Island.

I took photographs along the way of the many creatures that inhabit this littoral zone – that is not all covered in mud, but some of it is and that is not bad.

For years, photographs of just the mud flat with a view across to Gloucester Island (with Stone Island to the left in the foreground, of the next video), have been paraded as evidence of “devastated coral reefs” – including by Terry Hughes at that conference.

The photographs are just of the naturally muddy, what some would call “back reef”. Beyond that is an area of perhaps 900 metres dominated by coarse carbonate sands, and beyond that corals for perhaps 800 metres to the seafloor. Yesterday I walked across the mud flat and reef flat to the corals.

The most high-profile Great Barrier Reef researchers have denied the existence of the reef flat and then the corals at Bramston reef, which they variously confuse with the fringing reef at Stone Island. It is a shame. It suggests a high level of incompetence.

Bramston reef was probably at its most expansive and spectacular about 4,500 years ago when sea levels were about 1.5 metres higher (yes, higher). That was during the Holocene high stand.

Back then there would have been rapid vertical growth of the reef. By 3,000 years before the present, the reef was probably backfilling with the sea-level fall creating fossil microatolls.

That there is limited potential for vertical growth at present, has everything to do with the lack of sea level rise. Sea levels did come up over 100 meters between about 16,000 and 10,000 years ago! The climate is always changing. Indeed climate change began long before the industrial revolution.

It is confusing to me that while sea level fall is an un-controversial fact in the technical literature, there is so much concern about the perhaps 36 cm rise since about 1880 along the Queensland coast. Indeed, what is written in the newspapers is impossible to reconcile with what is in the technical, scientific literature. This is often the case with climate issues.

At Bramston reef the difference between high and low tide at this time of year is more than three metres. There will be much more coral exposed in August, when we get the very lowest tides for this part of the Earth for this year – and I’m planning to return then, to get more photographs, including of the corals.

Delicate Halimeda, amongst the mud.

********
The feature image (very first photograph, at top) is of a young Porites coral growing around mud on the reef flat taken by Jennifer Marohasy on 19th April 2019.

I’m still learning how to take a good ‘selfie’ … walking out to the reef, 19 April 2019.

Filed Under: Information Tagged With: Great Barrier Reef

Peter Ridd Has Won – Because of You

April 16, 2019 By jennifer

PETER Ridd was a professor at James Cook University who dared to question claims that the Great Barrier Reef is facing imminent catastrophe from climate change – eventually being sacked for not backing down.

With your support he has insisted:
1. That the university undertake some quality assurance of its research, and
2. Refused to be censored, for continuing to speak out.

The case has dragged on with a three-day hearing in the Federal Court in Brisbane just last month. When the hearing wrapped up the presiding Judge Salvadore Vasta said he hoped to have a judgement before Easter.

We were expecting some notice before this judgement was read in court. There was no notice, it happened this morning – and Peter Ridd has won on all counts!

The Court ordered that:
1. The 17 findings made by the University, the two speech directions, the five confidentiality directions, the no satire direction, the censure and the final censure given by the University and the termination of employment of Professor Ridd by the University were all unlawful.
2. The issue of the making of declarations and penalty are adjourned to a date to be fixed.

It is very significant that he has won on the issue of academic freedom: that he did have a right to ignore the university administrators and continuing to speak out about the lack of quality assurance and also against the disciplinary process he was being unfairly subjected to.

This is important news!

A clown fish at the Great Barrier Reef, photo taken in April 2005 off Cairns.

The university may have already spent over $1 million in legal fees attempting to silence Peter.

They have assumed that sooner or later he would run out of money … and courage. But not Peter, with his legal team and your support he has kept going.

I have known several good professors lose their will to fight once they are isolated, and risk bankruptcy.

Taking this fight to the Federal Court would not have been possible were it not for Peter Ridd deciding to take a stand in defense of the truth, to not back down regardless of the consequences.

Cheryl Ridd has been a rock, in support of Peter and the ugliness that goes with such court cases, including the unfair and untrue affaidavids.

John Roskam from the IPA found Peter the very best legal counsel in Stuart Wood QC.

We then went into fundraising mode – twice. The first time to fight the censure, and the second time for Peter to get his job back.

Bloggers Anthony Watts, Joanne Nova, and also Benny Peiser were terrific. Together we raised $260,000 from 2,405 people.

Today’s judgement is only that Peter Ridd was wrongly sacked from his position as professor at the university. He has not yet got his job back. There has been no ruling yet on remedies and restitutions. Further, the university may yet appeal.

Thank you for your support – so far.

Peter Ridd and Jennifer Marohasy speaking about the need for quality assurance in science in Sydney in February 2018.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Peter Ridd

New Drought Report: Consistently Dishonest, Consistently Misleading

April 16, 2019 By jennifer

DROUGHT is cruel. The farmer doesn’t know when it is going to end, how much longer they will need to keep feeding their livestock, and how much longer they must wait until they can plant a crop.

If the Australian Bureau of Meteorology were useful, they would provide a reliable long-term rainfall forecast. But they can’t – the Bureau’s three month seasonal, and longer rainfall forecasts, show no skill at forecasting. It is one thing never to admit such incompetence, but they are also being dishonest about the real state of the climate.

Their most recent drought report is replete with colored maps suggesting that it is getting drier and drier … and rainfall trends are variously described as “downwards”. This is not so.

Fig. 1. The bureau’s latest drought report shows colored maps, not time series charts – yet in the text there are claims of downward trends.

A colored map doesn’t necessarily provide any useful information about trend. The maps in the Bureau’s new drought report are simplistic depictions of points in time – relative to arbitrarily defined intervals in the past when it was wetter. The maps are colored red, suggesting danger. This is more propaganda from the behemoth.

The latest drought report focuses on eastern Australia, and particularly the Murray Darling Basin.

In reality the second half of the twentieth century was consistently wetter than the first half in this region of south eastern Australia. And while the last year has been desperately dry for farmers, it is not exceptionally dry considering the last 100 years of data – such statistics are obvious when annual rainfall is plotted from 1900 as a time series chart, as shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2. This chart shows how much rain has fallen each year since 1900, as an annual average for the Murray Darling Basin region. Such a chart provides some idea of change over time, which gives an idea of the trend.

The bureau consistently refuses to provide the available data in this form.

In the most recent report, they bemoan specific seasons and time intervals as being more intense and/or more severe in rainfall deficit. But if we are to cherry-pick, then why not consider how exceptionally wet it was in September 2016, as shown in Figure 3?

Fig. 3. When rainfall is considered on the basis of just one month, specifically, September, it is apparent that 2016 was exceptionally wet. Why was it exceptionally wet in September 2016?

Of course, the Bureau is run by “Science Managers” wedded to the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming – so they only show intervals when it is drier than average consistent with their theory that Australia will experience below average rainfall because of elevated levels of carbon dioxide. They show no curiosity when it comes to exceptionally wet periods in the recent record.

The managers at the Bureau are consistently dishonest in how they present the data, and the conclusions that they draw from it.

It is also fake news for the Bureau to claim that the drought is “exacerbated by record high temperatures” – and repeat that this last summer (2018-19) was Australia’s hottest. Considering the last 100 years, the hottest summer in the Murray-Darling Basin was probably the summer of 1938-39. In rural Victoria, the summer of 1938-1939 was on average at least two degrees hotter than anything measured with equivalent equipment since, as shown in Figure 4.

Fig. 4. It is possible to rank time intervals in different ways … by day, month, summer, year etcetera. Considering ‘summer’ as the three months of December, January and February then the summer of 1938-1939 was probably hotter than any other summer since records began.

The Bureau now measures temperatures as spot one-second readings from custom built electronic probes with unknown time constants*. So, there is no way of knowing how hot it was last summer relative to the very hot summers of say 1938-39, when temperatures were measured with mercury thermometers.

The use of electronic probes without averaging will give higher temperatures for the same weather, as I explain in a letter to the Chief Scientist.

_______________

*Some explanation of time constants, and why averaging is so important is included in three blog posts, with links following …

1. Explanation with worked theoretical examples

https://jennifermarohasy.com.dev.internet-thinking.com.au/2017/10/averaging-convention-not/

“The sensors can respond much more quickly to changes in temperature, and on a hot day, the air is warmed by turbulent streams of ground-heated air that can fluctuate by more than 2 degrees on a scale of seconds. So, if the Bureau simply changed from mercury thermometers to electronic sensors, it could increase the daily range of temperatures, and potentially even generate record hot days simply because of the faster response time of the sensors.

Except to ensure consistency with measurements from mercury thermometers there is an international literature, and international standards, that specify how spot-readings from sensors need to be averaged – a literature and methodology being ignored by the Bureau.

To be clear, the UK Met office takes 60 x 1 second samples each minute from its sensors, and then averages these. In the US, they have decided this is too short a period, and the standard there is to average over a fixed 5-minute period. In Australia, however, the Bureau takes not five-minute averages, nor even one-minute averages, but just one second spot-readings.

Check temperatures at the ‘latest observations’ page at the Bureau’s website and you would assume the value had been averaged over perhaps 10 minutes. But it is dangerous to assume anything when it comes to our Bureau. The values listed at the ‘observations’ page actually represent the last second of the last minute. The daily maximum (which you can find at a different page) is the highest one-second reading for the previous 24-hour period: a spot one-second reading in contravention of every international standard. There is absolutely no averaging.

Then again, how many of you knew that the mean daily temperature as reported by meteorological offices around the world is not an average of temperatures recorded through the day and night but rather the highest and the lowest divided by two – as is the convention?

This convention developed because (surface) temperature measurements were originally instantaneous measurements from mercury thermometers recorded manually each morning (providing the minima) and afternoon (providing the maxima).

So, in the UK the daily maximum from a weather station with an electronic sensor will be the highest value derived from the averaging of 60 samples over that one-minute interval, while in Australia, the daily maximum will be the highest one-second spot reading.

2. Explanation in context of record temperatures at Mildura, explaining how first probe recorded cooler than mercury thermometer

https://jennifermarohasy.com.dev.internet-thinking.com.au/2017/11/law-unto-australian-bureau-meteorology/

“The Bureau have since acknowledged that their method of recording temperatures from electronic sensors is not accredited, though they claim it nevertheless gives readings equivalent to mercury thermometers. Interestingly, your office emailed a journalist, backing them up – claiming that a single electronic sensor can “mirror the behaviour of liquid in glass thermometers”. This is nonsense, because mercury and alcohol thermometers have different time constants. This is one reason the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) insist on numerical averaging: alcohol thermometers (that measure temperature minima) have longer time constants than mercury thermometers (that measure temperature maxima).

3. Explanation in context of Mildura, how next/current probe records consistently warmer than a mercury thermometer

https://jennifermarohasy.com.dev.internet-thinking.com.au/2018/02/bom-blast-dubious-record-hot-day/

“Considering days when there is parallel data available in the temperature band of interest (the claimed-record hot day in September 2017 measured 37.7 degrees Celsius) the new probe has been found to measure up to 0.4 degrees hotter (e.g. 26 February 2013 the recording for the probe is 37.3, while the mercury thermometer recorded 36.9 on the A8 form) …

Filed Under: Information, News Tagged With: Drought

Free Julian Assange

April 12, 2019 By jennifer

I unequivocally support freedom of speech, and especially freedom of the press.  We need more outsiders like Julian Assange who take on the elites and the industrial military complex … and fearlessly publish without redaction.  

Much in the opinion piece published today by the WSWS articulates my concerns: 

“The World Socialist Web Site emphatically condemns the forcible seizure and arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. We call for an all-out campaign in the UK and internationally to defend Assange, oppose his extradition to the United States, and secure his freedom and return to Australia, with guarantees against any future prosecution.

“Assange is in grave peril. The US Justice Department has issued a statement claiming that Assange only faces charges that could lead to a prison sentence of up to five years if he has been found guilty. This is a transparent lie, the purpose of which is to facilitate Assange’s extradition and provide the Ecuadorean and British governments with a pretext that they are not turning Assange over to a government that might subject him to torture and execution.

If he is transferred to the custody of the United States, anything is possible, including charges of treason that carry a death penalty or indefinite detention as an “enemy combatant”.

Julian Assange was arrested Thursday morning at the Ecuadorian embassy in London

Assange has become a target because he did what journalists are supposed to do—expose the truth. Along with Chelsea Manning, who remains in prison for refusing to testify against the WikiLeaks publisher, Assange exposed the crimes that emerged out of wars launched on the basis of lies, which have led to the deaths of more than one million people.

New crimes are now being prepared. Even as the conspiracy against Assange was unfolding, Trump was meeting with Al-Sisi, the butcher of Cairo, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was issuing threats against Iran.

Everyone involved in this crime stands guilty of a monstrous attack on fundamental democratic rights, without even the pretense of due process.

Ecuadorian President Lenín Moreno, beset by a domestic crisis provoked by popular opposition to his corrupt administration, and desirous of economic aid offered by the White House, broke Ecuador’s own asylum laws to force Assange out. Its actions are a violation of the honor of Ecuadorean workers, who overwhelmingly support Assange.

The UK government, headed by Theresa May, is gloating over Assange’s arrest, issuing statements that are clearly prejudicial to any legal proceedings. When May, speaking to parliament, declared the “whole house will welcome the news this morning that the Metropolitan police have arrested Julian Assange,” Tory MPs and many Laborites cheered in approval.

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn issued a pro-forma statement declaring that the extradition of Assange “should be opposed by the British government,” but he kept his mouth shut when May issued her denunciation before parliament and has maintained a silence on Assange during his forced asylum in the Ecuadorean embassy.

As for the United States, while the Trump administration is now leading the campaign against Assange, the Democratic Party is solidly behind his persecution, blaming Assange for contributing to the exposure of the crimes for which Hillary Clinton was justly and massively hated. One of the central aims of the Democrats’ anti-Russia campaign has been to justify the attack on WikiLeaks as part of a broader campaign for internet censorship.

Added to the list of those responsible is the pseudo-left, the organizations of the upper middle class in the US and internationally, which seized on the initial fraudulent and trumped-up rape allegations against Assange to justify his persecution and their own cowardly abandonment of Assange to American imperialism.

For its part, the establishment media, which functions as an arm of the state, has jumped in to support the attack on Assange.

On Thursday evening, the editorial boards of the New York Times and the Washington Post issued statements supporting Assange’s extradition. “The government charged Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, not with publishing classified government information, but with stealing it,” declared the New York Times, adding “The administration has begun well by charging Mr. Assange with an indisputable crime.”

The Washington Post was even more open in its support of the Trump administration’s campaign against Assange, declaring “Mr. Assange’s case could conclude as a victory for the rule of law, not the defeat for civil liberties of which his defenders mistakenly warn.”
“Mr. Assange is not a free-press hero,” declares the Post. “Unlike real journalists, WikiLeaks dumped material into the public domain.” By the Post ’s definition, the only “real journalists” are those that self-censor at the behest of the Pentagon.

These newspapers, which once published the Pentagon Papers, are nothing but apologists for US imperialism. One can only imagine the howls of outrage that would issue from the media if it was the Russian government that had carried out the forcible seizure and arrest of a journalist and critic of its foreign policy!

In the seven years of Assange’s confinement in the Ecuadorean embassy, much has changed. Most significant is the eruption of class struggle internationally. It is the fear of the emergence of the class struggle, combined with growing opposition to capitalism, that is compelling the ruling elites to destroy all democratic rights, including the freedom of expression, of which Assange’s persecution is the most grotesque example.

In the working class there is overwhelming sympathy for Assange. A dividing line has opened up in social, economic, and political life. The ruling elites are shedding their democratic pretenses. Their media and the pseudo-socialist opposition—the representatives of the politics of the affluent upper-middle-class—function as defenders of the state and the dictatorship of the financial oligarchy.

It is the working class, the broad mass of the population, that must be mobilized to defend Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning and all class war prisoners. The demand for their freedom must be a rallying cry for the global working class.

The World Socialist Web Site calls on all workers and young people, and all those who uphold democratic rights, to come forward and take an unequivocal stand in defense of Julian Assange. Organize meetings, protests and demonstrations to demand his immediate release and his safe return to Australia!

Statement of the World Socialist Web Site Editorial Board.

Filed Under: Information Tagged With: Freedom of Speech

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Ian Thomson on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Dave Ross on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Dave Ross on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Alex on Incarceration Nation: Frightened of Ivermectin, and Dihydrogen monoxide
  • Wilhelm Grimm III on Incarceration Nation: Frightened of Ivermectin, and Dihydrogen monoxide

Subscribe For News Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

April 2019
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« Mar   May »

Archives

Footer

About Me

Jennifer Marohasy Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD has worked in industry and government. She is currently researching a novel technique for long-range weather forecasting funded by the B. Macfie Family Foundation. Read more

Subscribe For News Updates

Subscribe Me

Contact Me

To get in touch with Jennifer call 0418873222 or international call +61418873222.

Email: jennifermarohasy at gmail.com

Connect With Me

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2014 - 2018 Jennifer Marohasy. All rights reserved. | Legal

Website by 46digital