• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Jennifer Marohasy

Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Speaker
  • Blog
  • Temperatures
  • Coral Reefs
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Archives for October 2006

About Richard Ness, by Eric

October 25, 2006 By jennifer

My Dad, Richard Ness, is the President Director of PT Newmont Minahasa Raya and is currently on trial in Indonesia.

He and my step mom Nova, have five sons. My step Mom was born in Indonesia and Dad has spent a total of over 20 years in various parts of Indonesia and also in other parts of the world. My younger bother was born in Australia.

Dad was born and raised on a farm in Northern Minnesota. He attended Moorhead Technical Institute, and on graduating was employed by a Caterpillar heavy equipment dealership. Seven years later, he made the decision to change career paths, returning to teach at the same technical institute he had graduated from.

In 1979 he took a sabbatical leave, packed up his family, and traveled to Indonesia to accept a consulting assignment to design and develop a maintenance program and mechanical training curriculum for Freeport’s Mine in Papua, East Indonesia. He later joined Freeport and lived in Papua for 10 years where he spent some of his time learning the rich culture and exploring the rugged beauty of that part of the world. I remember he spent time in various villages assisting in the development of health and education infrastructure. He later moved to Jakarta as Vice President of the company.

His responsibilities in Jakarta, included promotion of local procurement, and he conducted several feasibility studies, including a study for a copper smelter. In addition he focused on any opportunity to expand business in Indonesia. Dad continued his interest in economics and development through further studies at Harvard Business School.

Without doubt, it is Dad’s belief that the biggest enemy of the environment is poverty, and poverty can only be overcome with positive policy changes. Through his work in Indonesia, Dad has been part of a team which has created over 23,000 direct jobs for the Indonesian people and maybe four times that many in indirect employment plus represents in excess of $6 billion in direct investment into the Indonesian economy.

That was what Dad did for a living. He lives his life in trying to make the world a better place. He has been the Mining Chair of both the American Chamber of Commerce as well as the Mining Chair for the International Chamber for several years, promoting both investment and legislative reform. He was also First Vice President of the American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia, often traveling to Washington D.C. to lobby the US Government on behalf of Indonesia on array of issues ranging from trade, investment to foreign policy. He is currently on the Executive Board and former Vice Chairman of the Indonesian Mining Association promoting responsible mine development and legislative improvements that would benefit both Indonesia and investors.

On the international front, he has represented the International Chamber of Commerce as a United Nations delegate to both regional assemblies as well as representing business at the United Nations 10 year World Summit for Sustainable Development, helping outlining how governments and the private sector work together to reduce poverty and set the 10 year millennium goals at the United Nations Assembly.

In Johannesburg, one of the Indonesian projects showcased as a partnership initiative included a project that a group of Dad’s employees had worked on with the local universities and dive association to undertake a major reef coral reef rehabilitation project in North Sulawesi. At the time, this was the single largest private sector reef rehabilitation project in the world and has continued to be very successful.

My Dad has worked and been a delegate representing Asian region to the World Bank on their world wide Extractive Industries Review; with a similar focus on how oil, gas and mining can reduce poverty and improve living standards of developing nations. He also helped co-author the economic section of the plan for the Council of Foreign Relations on how economic development can help reduce conflict in Papua. None of these activities were part of his formal job, and they took precious time away from his family, however, he firmly believed that if one does not take the time help change the world along with the environment that we live in, by fighting to reduce poverty in an ever growing world population, the conditions for the poor and underprivileged will only get worse.

Do my parents practice what they preach?

Yes they do! Dad’s main social focus at work is poverty reduction – health – education – environment. At home, Mom and Dad have, and continue, in supporting literally 100’s of children with school fees and books on the islands of Lombok, North Sulawesi and Jakarta.

It is our family’s belief that only through education and policy change, can those who are underprivileged raise themselves from poverty, and it is only when economic conditions improve will environmental conditions dramatically advance.

There is no lack of opportunity to make a significant impact in poverty reduction in Indonesia. If you use the $2 per capita per day as a poverty bench mark, then almost half of the nation is living below this level. My parents are involved in supporting orphanages in North Sulawesi, Jakarta and Lombok.

I know that they, along with other employees of Newmont, are active in many other programs and with everyone’s combined efforts have made a difference; including surgery for those in need, personal support to remote medical clinics, not forgetting to mention support for Indonesia’s share of natural disasters – from tsunami’s in Aceh to earth quakes in Central Java.

I know when the tsunami struck Aceh and the island of Nias the whole world pitched in to assist, from Governments, relief agencies, NGO’s, religious groups as well as companies and individuals from the private sector. I know dad was also willing to do his part, and he was invited along with a handful of long term experienced residents to offer suggestions and advise on recovery planning to the United Nations special council.

But what do Mom and Dad do besides work, plus meeting their religious and social obligations?

Dad is an avid reader. In the past he was my diving buddy, and he likes fishing. Both enjoy good food and like to cook, watch a good film. They both love children.

But when Dad really needs to clear his mind, he regresses to his younger days and cranks up his motor cycle and goes for a ride.

RickOnNess.JPG

——————————
As a reader of this blog you may like to tell us something about yourself, a colleague or friend. Please send to jennifermarohasy@jennifermarohasy.com. Contributions are filed under ‘People’. Scroll down to read about some of the other contributors to this blog. There is a note from Richard Ness here.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: People

Environmentalists Win, Win, Win on Climate Change: Ben Oquist

October 24, 2006 By jennifer

The “environmentalists’ arguments about climate change” are being accepted across Australia: embraced by everyone from Mel and Kochie, presenters of popular TV program Sunrise, to the Prime Minister John Howard.

That was the message from Ben Oquist, political consultant and former Bob Brown adviser, writing yesterday in Australia’s tabloid e-news journal Crikey.

Oquist went on to caution that ” the war” will only really be won when, there is a legislative commitment to guarantee emissions will be reduced 60-90% by mid century and a commitment to address coal exports which are by far Australia’s biggest contribution to global greenhouse emissions.

In the same paragraph Oquist states that if we get emissions down by 60-90% we can stop dangerous climate change. Now that is some false claim, particularly given Australia is responsible for such a small percent of global emissions and falling!

But I doubt anyone noticed the ridiculousness of Oquist’s claim amongst the many other fashionable but false pronouncements being made yesterday in Australia.

Columnist Paul Sheehan writing in the Sydney Morning Herald in a piece entitled ‘We fiddle as the continent turns to dust’ insisted that the word drought be replaced by the word climate change: “Most people still talk about the “drought”. It is not a drought. It is climate change. We changed the landscape. We cut, stripped, gouged, channelled and laid it bare. And thus changed the climate. How can we solve a problem when we can’t even name it, and thus still can’t even face it?”

I am surprised Sheehan didn’t include carbon dioxide in that paragraph!

Glen Milne writing in The Australia explained the Prime Minister “today goes to the South Pacific Forum,where the islands are sinking into the sea. When he gets back, he will go straight on another drought tour to inspect our once mighty rivers, now disappearing though the parched maw of the earth. There are no more flooding plains. Apparently there is nothing left but drought.”

The article was entitled ‘Liberals musts catch up on climate change’.

Milne went on to explain that: “In another sign of the rising temperature of the climate change debate (if you’ll excuse the pun), Al Gore is to return to Australia. But this time he won’t be spruiking his global warming film, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’. Instead, under the auspices of the Climate Project and the Australian Conservation Foundation, Gore will train 75 volunteer ‘climate changers’ to replicate here his famous PowerPoint presentation on which An Inconvenient Truth was based. Each volunteer will guarantee to deliver at least 10 seminars over the next 12 months. That’s 750 sessions across the country, minimum. And given the passion of these advocates, it’s likely to be at least twice that. That’s a lot of increasingly convinced minds, with an election looming”.

All of this on top of Australia’s Climate Institute stepping up their campaign to “educate us” including with advertisements on rural television explaining that “we can control climate change”.

Maybe this is where Oquist got the idea that we can some how stop climate change?

Add to all of this hysteria, consideration of the activities of celebrity scientists like Tim Flannery and David Suzuki. Suzuki was in Australia last week and I heard him on ABC radio explaining that we can stop climate change by signing Kyoto. Another porkie!

Add to this the relentless self-interested advice that comes from the professional scientific and bureaucratic groups involved in greenhouse studies in Australia.

And, of course, don’t forget the quick start to the current bushfire season and El Nino, which promise to deliver both a long, hard summer and a reinforced climate alarmism in Australia.

Finally, reflect that the Stern Report (which will boost the economic alarmism) is to be released in London shortly, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessment Report (which will boost the science alarmism) is scheduled for release in February, 2007.

Yes, I think Ben Oquist is right… it’s a win, win, win for environmentalists!

——————————
This post is based on an email from Cathy.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Climate & Climate Change

Log a Tree, Sequest Some Carbon: Mark Poynter

October 21, 2006 By Mark Poynter

Only 10 percent of Victoria’s native forests are logged. Yet anti-logging campaigners are still unhappy, ramping up a campaign in conjunction with the upcoming state election to have the industry closed down completely.

Why anyone would oppose the sustainable harvest of such a small percentage of Victoria’s extensive native forest estate is difficult for me to understand. Then again I see both environmental and economic benefits in growing and cutting down trees as part of the active management of a native forest.

In ‘Campaigners can’t see forest for trees’ Mark Poynter* expains the value of logging in terms of carbon sequestration:

“Sustainable logging in Victoria’s designated wood production zones produces about 1.5 million cubic metres of hardwood sawlogs and residual logs a year from an estimated total harvested biomass of about 2.1 million cubic metres, including roots, bark, branches and foliage. The concept of sustainability dictates that annually harvested amount is replaced by an equivalent volume of growth.

Carbon sequestered each year in new biomass growth in Victoria’s production zones is estimated to be equivalent to saving 2.6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions. This is net of emissions from fuel and power use inherent to timber production and emissions from the regeneration process. It is also additional to the carbon that could have been sequestered if the forest had alternatively been left unlogged.

Putting this into perspective is that clean energy produced from Victorian wind farms has been estimated to save 250,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year. Put another way, if anti-logging campaigns were to close Victoria’s native forest timber industry, 10 times as many wind turbines as now exist would be required just to make up for the carbon sequestration lost by “locking up” wood production forests.

Enhanced carbon sequestration is only part of the “greenhouse” benefit of sustainable logging. Australian domestic hardwood production also offsets imports of tropical hardwoods and the use of steel, aluminium and concrete that offer poor environmental outcomes.”

Read the full article, click here .

If 10 times as many wind turbines would be required to offset the locking up of wood production in the 10 percent of the forest that is still harvested, how much more carbon could be sequested if government allowed logging in say 30 percent of the forest estate? Not to mention the potential environmental and economic benefits.

—————-
Mark Poynter is a forestry consultant, member of the Institute of Foresters of Australia and a member of the Australian Environment Foundation (AEF). His slide show entitled ‘Saving Australian Forests, A Counter-Productive Indulgence’ given at the recent AEF conference can be viewed by clicking here.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Forestry

Kelvin Thomson Vilifies IPA Over Global Warming

October 20, 2006 By jennifer

Anyone who questions global warming is spreading misinformation and undermining the scientific consensus according to Kelvin Thomson, Australia’s shadow minister for public accountability and human services.

This senior member of the Labor party recently wrote to Australian companies warning them away from the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA)*.

The letter states we are propagandists and that “global warming is happening, it is man-made, and it is not good for us.”

I often speak publicly on global warming as a senior fellow at the IPA. My assessment of the situation is based on my own reading and independent analysis.

I agree with Kelvin Thomson that global warming is happening. But I am not convinced that the warming is wholly or even mostly man-made. Indeed the geological record shows that the earth has been warming since the last glacial maximum about 20,000 years ago and it is unclear how much of the current warming is a continuation of this trend or due to the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

As regards the purported consensus, earlier this year sixty accredited experts in climate and related scientific disciplines sent an open letter to the Canadian prime minister, Stephen Harper, explaining that “global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural noise.”

Just last month, William M. Gray, professor emeritus of atmospheric science, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University explained: “My main motivation to continue my research is to help maintain the integrity of American science which, in my view, has been badly compromised by the global warming issue and now recently by the issue of global warming causing more frequent and more intense hurricanes.”

In seeking to ‘name and shame’ those who fund the IPA, Thomson is following the led of the Royal Society, Britain’s leading scientific academy. The society recently wrote to US energy company Exxon Mobil asking that it stop funding groups that it believes ‘misrepresented the science of climate change by outright denial of the evidence’.

After outlining the extent and diversity of energy and climate change related research funded by ExxonMobil, the 3-page response from ExxonMobil’s vice president of public affairs, Kenneth Cohen, concluded: “Our own objective, as it relates to climate change, is to seek solutions that protect the environment but do not threaten the aspirations of the billions of people who desire and deserve a better quality of life. Is that not a worthwhile road to be on? We have a role to play in the policy discussions on these subjects. It is disappointing that representatives of the Royal Society find it appropriate to intentionally misstate our actions and positions relating to these important topics.”

Are we entering a period of Climate McCarthyism?

In today’s Australian Financial Review, the IPA’s executive director, John Roskam, in a piece entitled ‘ALP needs climate change’, argues that “despite differences about the causes of climate change, it would be hoped that there’s one aspect of the issue about which there could be unanimiity. Ideally, all sides of the issue would agree that discussion about climate change is a good thing — and the more discussion the better.”

The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) is an independent, non-profit, public policy think tank, dedicated to preserving and strengthening the foundations of economic and political freedom. Support debate and discussion on global warming, join the IPA today.

——————
* The letter, dated 27th September, also names the International Policy Network, the American Enterprise Institute, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the European Science and Environment Forum as undermining the scienitific consensus.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Climate & Climate Change

Growing Biodiesel In Northern Australia: Roger Kalla

October 19, 2006 By jennifer

Outspoken liberal senator Bill Heffernan has suggested that Australia’s farmers move North to the tropical parts of Australia where there is more water.

In two recent blog posts at the GMO Pundit Website Roger Kalla asks: What would farmers grow in northern Australia?

In the first post he considers soybeans for biodiesel and animal feed: http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/go-north-young-man-go-north-cropping.html .

And in the second cotton for biodiesel: http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/another-biodiesel-crop-for-northern.html .

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Drought, Food & Farming

How to Count Don’t Count Planes, And Not Include Don’t Count Coal, While And We’ll Making Kyoto?

October 19, 2006 By jennifer

According to Hilary Osborne writing for The Guardian:

“Emissions from air travel have doubled since 1990, to make up 6 percent of the UK’s carbon footprint. Forecasts suggest that the increase in flights will mean that by 2050, emissions from aviation could be between four and 10 times higher than they were in 1990, making it almost impossible for the government to achieve its target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 60 percent.”

But according to the same article, aviation is not included in the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). So I guess it doesn’t count?*

It’s perhaps a bit like Germany excluding its new coal fired power stations?

Indeed a few months ago Germany admitted it had probably over estimated its emissions and acknowledging that it needed to tighten its greenhouse gas emissions limit in the second round of the EU’s carbon market, while at the same time suggesting that new coal plants will opt out of the ETS.

So Germany got the credits for the old coal-fired power stations it closed down, but it won’t count the new one’s it builds? At least it wants a 14 years moratorium before it starts counting them?*

How does this work? Do Germany and the aviation industry have really good negotiators?

—————–
* Changes made to this post following comments from Steve, see below.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Climate & Climate Change

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Ian Thomson on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Dave Ross on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Dave Ross on Vax-ed as Sick as Unvax-ed, Amongst My Friends
  • Alex on Incarceration Nation: Frightened of Ivermectin, and Dihydrogen monoxide
  • Wilhelm Grimm III on Incarceration Nation: Frightened of Ivermectin, and Dihydrogen monoxide

Subscribe For News Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

October 2006
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Sep   Nov »

Archives

Footer

About Me

Jennifer Marohasy Jennifer Marohasy BSc PhD has worked in industry and government. She is currently researching a novel technique for long-range weather forecasting funded by the B. Macfie Family Foundation. Read more

Subscribe For News Updates

Subscribe Me

Contact Me

To get in touch with Jennifer call 0418873222 or international call +61418873222.

Email: jennifermarohasy at gmail.com

Connect With Me

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2014 - 2018 Jennifer Marohasy. All rights reserved. | Legal

Website by 46digital