Jennifer Marohasy

a forum for the discussion of issues concerning the natural environment

Archives for September 6, 2005

Wildflowers Follow Rain

By

Much of western Queensland received winter rain this year and the last few weeks has apparently seen the country-side transformed with a spectacular display of wildflowers. ABC radio Western Queensland has put together a photo gallery at,

http://www.abc.net.au/westqld/stories/s1448489.htm .

I used to press wildflowers when I was a little girl. One of the best Christmas presents I ever received was ‘Wild Flowers of the World’ with paintings by Barbara Everard and that was for Christmas in 1975. Of course, I still have the book.

On Hurricanes, including Katrina

By

Blog site ‘real climate’ has an interesting review of the relationship between hurricanes (frequency and intensity) and global warming with particular reference to Katrina.

By way of introduction:

The key connection is that between sea surface temperatures (we abbreviate this as SST) and the power of hurricanes. Without going into technical details about the dynamics and thermodynamics involved in tropical storms and hurricanes … the basic connection between the two is actually fairly simple: warm water, and the instability in the lower atmosphere that is created by it, is the energy source of hurricanes. This is why they only arise in the tropics and during the season when SSTs are highest (June to November in the tropical North Atlantic).

I particularly noted the paragraph:

It has been asserted (for example, by the NOAA National Hurricane Center) that the recent upturn in hurricane activity is due to a natural cycle, e.g. the so-called Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (“AMO”). The new results by Emanuel (Fig. 2) argue against this hypothesis being the sole explanation: the recent increase in SST (at least for September as shown in the Figure) is well outside the range of any past oscillations. Emanuel therefore concludes in his paper that “the large upswing in the last decade is unprecedented, and probably reflects the effect of global warming.” However, caution is always warranted with very new scientific results until they have been thoroughly discussed by the community and either supported or challenged by further analyses. Previous analysis of the AMO and natural oscillation modes in the Atlantic (Delworth and Mann, 2000; Kerr, 2000) suggest that the amplitude of natural SST variations averaged over the tropics is about 0.1-0.2 C, so a swing from the coldest to warmest phase could explain up to ~0.4 C warming.

I wonder what Chris Landsea, the hurricane expert who resigned from the IPCC because of politics and ‘climate change campaigning’, thinks about recent hurricanes Katrina and Denis … and also about Emanuel?

Link to the post at real climate:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=181 .

Link to Chris Landsea’s letter of resignation from the IPCC:
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/science_policy_general/000318chris_landsea_leaves.html

Where’s the Market Premium for Non- GM Canola?

By

After I wrote about the anti-GM lobby group the ‘Network of Concerned Farmers’ and their misinformation campaign in my column in The Land newspaper (11th August edition, pg. 24), I received letters and emails accusing me of not understanding basic marketing principles. I was told that Australian canola growers are better off because they have more market opportunities, including a potential price premium, because GM canola has been banned in Australia.

(Canada and Argentina, both big Canola producers, grow and export product from mostly GM canola varieties – varieties banned in all canola growing states in Australia.)

I was surprised that no-one contested, or seemed concerned by, my allegation in that column that the Network of Concerned Farmers is neither honest nor consistent in its rhetoric. All the correspondence was focused on perceived ‘market advantage’.

(And why is it that ‘left leaning greenies’ become so focused on ‘market advantage’ when it comes to GM issues?)

I note that Farm Online has a piece today explaining that canola prices appear likely to remain at their current depressed levels or lower, with a large Canadian crop impacting on the market.

It continues:

Currently, canola is trading at around $330/tonne port, but industry analysts are predicting a further drop, saying the Australian market is already trading above international levels.

Many farmers consider $350/t the lowest price at which canola is viable.

In Canada, weather conditions are said to be unlikely to have a negative impact from now on, with most canola already windrowed.

On top of this, industry sources suggested Canada will be looking to get rid of a large amount of last season’s carryover stock, leading to further discounts in prices.

This is bad news for Australian growers, who at the same stage last year were presented with a golden opportunity to lock in prices over $400/t on the back of weather uncertainty in the northern hemisphere.

With Canada set to be able to fill core canola markets, such as Japan and Mexico, canola marketers will be forced to make sure their product becomes cheaper in relation to rival commodities, such as soybeans.

Where is the market concern with GM? Where is the market advantage in not growing GM? Why do Australian state governments continue with their bans on the growing of GM food crops?

It is not only a question of choice, but the environmental advantages of growing GM canola are compelling, see for example, http://www.ipa.org.au/files/news_263.html.